This opinion piece appeared in the Cape Argus on Thursday 23rd October.
Earlier this month I attended two events
which at their core aimed to achieve the same thing – entrepreneur development
and job creation, but which illustrate the huge gulf that exists in South
Africa between the worlds of the informal township entrepreneur and the
connected tech entrepreneur. They also gave me an insight into the political
and economic terrains in these two worlds, where the language used seems to
have been drawn from completely different dictionaries, written with
contrasting ideologies and politcial imperatives in mind.
The first event was the Township
Revitalisation Summit in Orlando Stadium, Soweto, convened by Gauteng Premier
David Makhura. The second was the SiMODiSA Start Up SA conference at the Cape
Town International Convention Centre. The two venues immediately set the scene
for a dichotomous relationship.
Most township businesses eek out a living
not in these parks but by the side of the road, in home-based or rented
premises which are mostly unsuited to running a professional business. Informal
traders are regularly harrassed by metro police, their goods confiscated and
their licences revoked for no good reason.
By contrast, townships have seen massive
investment in shopping malls, an indication of South Africa’s consumer rather
than producer focus. These malls are occupied by big retail chains which suck
money out of the townships and do nothing to stimulate the local economies or
local manufacturers. It is estimated Soweto’s consumer spend is as much as R13
billion of which only 24% is spent in the township.
1 500 people squeezed into the Orlando
Stadium conference room to listen to Premier Makhura, Deputy President Cyril
Ramaphosa, MEC Lebogang Maile and Dr Thami Mazwai extol the virtues of the
revitalisation programme, which kicks off with a R160 million investment in
basic infrastructure and facilities for township businesses. Lindiwe Zulu,
Minister of Small Business Development, was due to jointhem at the afternoon
session which I could not stay for.
They made much of the partnership they said
government wished to establish with big business, but could not help take a dig
at “white monopoly capital” which they said is robbing small businesses of
opportunities to enter the formal economy.
Why did they not invite some
representatives from big business to attend the Summit, I thought? Wouldn’t
this demonstrate they were serious about the partnership? Perhaps the white
monopolists would be fearful for their safety among such a gathering, whipped
into a frenzy by political rhetoric. The government big wigs were quite blunt
in pointing out to their audience that they were “their people”, in other words
ANC supports. But in conversations I had with many off them afterwards I’m not
so sure.
There were multiple complaints about
corruption, poor service delivery, rude treatment by government bureaucrats,
late payments, crime and a host of other things hampering their businesses. The
things contributing to the ANC slipping to just 53% of the vote in the May
elections. There is clearly a political motive behind the Gauteng ANC’s sudden
cosying up to the townships. It’s where they risk losing Johannnesburg and
Tshwane in 2016.
Three days later and 1 400 kilometers away,
I participated in the panel discussing ‘Government as an Enabler of
Entrepreneurship’ at the SiMODiSA conference in Cape Town. SiMODiSA is a
not-for-profit association set up after an initial meeting convened last year
by then Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan and a group of SA entrepreneurs based
in the USA. Its aim is the acceleration of high-growth businesses which will
create many of the jobs the country needs to reach the NDP’s target of 11
million jobs by 2014.
Sadly, the panellist from government did
not turn up so we could not hear any views on what government was doing in this
vital arena. Moreover my counterpart, Lindiwe Zulu, initially accepted an
invitation to participate but cancelled at the last minute. So we had the
bizarre situation where I was asked for my views, uncontested by a government
representative, so I readily obliged.
Government can be an enabler of
entrepreneurship first by providing leadership for South Africa’s
‘entrepreurial ecosystem’. This means standing up for business as the only real
job creators we have. It means reducing regulations and red tape which hamper
start-ups, paying small businesses on time, easing labour laws which deter job
creation, and cutting talk of ‘white monopoly capital’ which frightens big
business away, doing nothing to open up their supply chains.
Government, and Lindiwe Zulu in particular,
needs to take a long hard look at why the total early-stage entrepreneurship
(TEA) rate is so low in South Africa and why the failure rate of small
businesses is so high. She needs to examine ways of creating the conditions to
support both survivalist businesses and high-growth tech start-ups. She should
recognise her constituency is not just the sweet seller in Soweto but also the
software engineer in Woodstock.
So here we had two events, each aiming to
stimulate entrepreneurship and job creation – one was all government and no
business, the other all business and no government. If we carry on like this we
will get nowhere. Somehow these two worlds need to get together and agree on a
common language and set of political and economic priorities.
As probably the only person to be both in
Orlando Stadium and the CTICC I feel like something of a lone voice on this issue,
calling for these two worlds to come together. For the country’s sake they
must, sooner or later. I will be doing my best to make sure they do.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are welcome but will be moderated before being published.