The need to create jobs in South Africa is
accepted as our most urgent priority. Jobs put money into people’s pockets, reduce their dependency on the state, increase the choices open to them and
their families and swell their sense of self-worth.
A high rate of unemployment is not a
uniquely South African problem. It is a world-wide phenomenon and countries are
trying to implement different job creation policies depending on their economic
circumstances and political dynamics.
Former Gallup Chairman Jim Clifton sums up
the scale of the challenge in his book, The Coming Jobs War: ”If countries fail at creating jobs, their
societies will fall apart. Countries, and more specifically cities, will experience
suffering, instability, chaos, and eventually revolution. This is the new world
that leaders will confront.”
South Africa’s 37% unemployment rate (to
take the wide definition) is one of the highest in the world and is proving to
be an intractible problem. For South Africa to avoid economic and social breakdown
we have to solve it, and soon.
In trying to figure out how we create jobs
the starting point must be to ask the question, what is a job? This is not so
trivial a question as it might seem. Commentary on the issue is clogged up in
political ideology and rhetoric without a proper appreciation of the
fundamentals.
A job is created when a person sells his or
her labour to someone else for money. Turned around, my employer is buying my
labour, time, expertise, skills or work capacity because it needs it to produce
goods or services which it sells to customers.
In economics, labour is known as a factor
of production. Other factors include capital, land or property, technology and
entrepreneurship. These inputs are combined together in a business to produce
outputs and the efficiency and productivity of this production will determine
whether they generate profit or loss. Profits lead to expansion, losses lead to
decline and eventual closure of the business.
So a job is understood first and foremost
in economic terms. One of the first laws of economics is that of supply and
demand. For more jobs to be created, demand for jobs must grow and there needs
to be a ready supply of appropriate labour. How do we optimise supply and
demand to create more jobs?
There are various ways, all susceptible to analysis
by common sense and economic theory. Increased demand for a factor of
production (such as a job) generally, though not always, follows a reduction in
price or an increase in the utility or value of that factor. So I, as a free
agent wishing to sell my labour, time or expertise, can price it to maximise
the likelihood of an employer buying it, at a rate which we are both prepared
to accept. If lots of other people offer the same as me I become a “price
taker”, in other words the employer can bargain down my wages because there is
lots of supply in the job market.
To increase the value or utility of my
time, labour or expertise I need to improve my skills so what I offer an
employer becomes more attractive and it is willing to pay me more for it.
Theoretically, because of our high rate of
unemployment, the potential supply of labour is close to being unlimited.
Trouble is, most of this labour is not what employers need or is priced too
high so making it unattractive. We have too many unskilled and not enough
skilled people around.
The inescapable conclusion is that to stimulate
demand for unskilled jobs we have to reduce their price. To increase the supply
of skilled people we have to invest in education and skills development.
A complicating factor affecting the supply
and demand for jobs is costs imposed on the employer once a job is created. This
includes the time, money and frustrations involved in complying with
regulations and red tape. The higher these costs the greater the disincentive
for the employer to hire more people. By
reducing those costs, or incentivising the employer with benefits to
offset those costs, it will be more likely to hire.
Another way of increasing demand for jobs
is growing the number of job creators themselves – entrepreneurs, the most
fundamental factor of production. Entrepreneurs create businesses which create
jobs, so finding ways of encouraging entrepreneurship is vital to stimulating
job creation.
For South Africa to create jobs we have to
increase the demand for them by either raising their utility value or reducing
their cost. This simple equation puts such issues as minumum wages, decent (i.e.
high-paying) jobs, flexibility of labour markets and mechanisms for stimulating
entrepreneurshiop into perspective. Every policy initiative and reform should therefore
home in relentlessly on how to solve this equation with the goal of creating
more jobs.
In the past twenty years South Africa has
produced a raft of legislation not suited to an economy at our stage of
development. There is too much emphasis on protecting those with jobs and not
enough on finding ways of creating new ones. This applies to large and small
businesses alike. Large businesses are increasingly shedding jobs in favour of
labour-saving equipment and technology so ecomomic growth is not translated
into new jobs.
The ANC is obsessed with dividing the
existing economic cake through punitive laws and regulations when it should be
more concerned with growing the cake. This is why we have economic growth of
1.5% not 5%, unemployment of 37% not 10% and a budget deficit inflated by an
unaffordable government wage bill rather than a budget surplus fueled by
increased corporate and income tax revenues.
A root and branch review of all legislation
and regulations that hinder job creation should be top of Small Business
Development Minister Lindiwe Zulu’s New Year to-do list. Her department must be
willing to inject fresh thinking into government circles and challenge tired
notions of state-led growth and state intervention in all spheres of the
economy.
This fresh thinking starts with getting
back to economic fundamentals. Only then will we unlock the potential of our
economy to grow, so increasing and spreading wealth and reducing levels of
poverty and unemployment to acceptable levels.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are welcome but will be moderated before being published.