This week the Parliamentary portfolio
committees sit for the second time in the current session, having elected their
chairpersons last week. In an unusual arrangement, members of the Portfolio
Committee on Small Business Development will attend not only their own but also
those of Trade & Industry and Economic Development.
The reason, presumably, is that this new
department will have to sequester a number of duties, functions and agencies
from the other two in order to do its job. A fair amount of bargaining and
arm-twisting needs to happen before the department’s shape is determined.
We will get a sense of Minister Lindiwe Zulu’s
strategy when we see this shape emerging. Will she take over the bureaucracy
managing the myriad agencies and programmes for small business residing in the
DTI and EDD, or assume a co-ordinating and troubleshooting role, becoming a
small business czar and advocate with the ear of the Presidency?
As she and her team ponder these questions,
a good starting point would be to revisit the National Small Business Act
promulgated way back in 1996 and amended in 2004. These established the
legislative foundation for DTI policy on promoting and supporting small
business.
It is surprising the Minister has not, so
far as I am aware, mentioned this Act in statements issued since her
appointment. Especially in view of what is contained in Section 4 of the Act, which
I reviewed recently with Chris Darroll, CEO of policy think tank SBP.
Ms Darroll was one of the contributors to
the Act, representing the now-disbanded Sunnyside Group that pressed for
deregulation in all legislation passed in the 1990s. One of its focus areas was
small business, which even then was wrapped in red tape. Little has changed,
despite the provisions of the Act.
In the Determination of Guidelines of Section 4 of the Act, clause 18 (1) states: “The Minister may, by notice in
the Gazette, publish guidelines for organs of state in national, provincial and
local spheres of government to promote small business and the National Small
Business Support Strategy.”
Falling within its
embrace are small business organisations, trade unions and other representative
organisations, whose affairs the Minister is empowered to regulate on “any
matter which in terms of this Act is required or permitted to be prescribed.”
They key word for
Minister Zulu to ponder on is “guidelines”.
Under the Act she can
issue guidelines to the Department of Labour exempting small businesses from
provisions in the Labour Relations Act that make life difficult for them, such
as those entitling unions to use their premises for meetings and imposing sector
bargaining council pay scales.
She can do the same
with the Treasury, taking a cue from the Davis Tax Committee which recommended a
raft of changes to tax law affecting small business.
But for the Act to
have teeth guidelines are not enough.
Other organs of state and interested parties can ignore them. Recommendations
and guidelines are unenforceable.
So, for instance, the
Treasury only accepted two of the Davis recommendations, while measures on
labour reform agreed in Nedlac last year, such as mandatory secret ballots
before strikes are called, were thrown out by the Labour Portfolio Committee under
pressure from unions.
Minister Zulu should
bring the Act back into Committee and let us debate how we can give it, and her
department, teeth and the power to legislate across departmental boundaries. Or
at the very least, force her Cabinet colleagues to relax regulations that
strangle entrepreneurship and hinder job creation.
Force is something the
ANC understands well, but not when it is on the receiving end. Zulu will have
to develop a thick hide, and very persuasive advocacy skills, to have any
impact on her colleagues. The DA will support her if she shows some mettle, and
prove the naysayers to the formation of her department wrong. She has already
come up against resistance from COSATU when she hinted at changes to labour
legislation to help small business.
One piece of
legislation screaming for a re-write is the Business Licensing Bill which DTI
Minister Rob Davis introduced last year.
He had to withdraw it after howls of protest from businesses and civil
society, but insists he will bring it back to Parliament. If he does, it is an
opportunity for Zulu to make her mark.
But first the Minister
should focus on listening, especially to the likes of which the ANC has traditionally
side-lined including the Free Market Foundation, the SA Institute for
Entrepreneurship, chambers of business and other organisations sitting at the
coalface of enterprise development. She needs to consult on how to define the
sector: where does the department draw the line between small, medium and micro
enterprises, and how should interventions be crafted appropriately for each? What
is international best practice in small business development and how can we
bring it to SA?
Exciting times lie
ahead for the Portfolio Committee on Small Business Development. We will endeavour
to keep the business community and other interested parties closely informed and
ensure an open and noisy policy debate.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are welcome but will be moderated before being published.